0:00
Current time: 0:00 / Total time: -3:07
-3:07

I’ve been thinking a lot lately about paywalls—specifically, how to integrate them into my creative process without turning my work into something that’s just transactional.

It’s a delicate balancing act between offering up the creative content I love making and needing to put a price on it to sustain that creativity. So I’m experimenting and have decided to paywall half of my NSFW videos.

While I don't love the idea of paywalls, I also understand their necessity.

As a wise man recently reminded me, "If you have to pay for something, then it automatically has value, whereas things offered freely usually do not."

(Shoutout to Mr. Shoemaker for that nugget of wisdom.)

So, here’s the deal: If you can subscribe, great! If you can’t, that’s okay too.
Send me a DM or email, and I’ll gladly comp you a free month. No questions asked.

The plan for now? I’ll be aiming to produce at least one video available to everyone each week and at least one for paid subscribers. Hopefully more, but I’d rather under-promise and over-deliver.

As a creative type, I’ve learned that making promises I can’t keep tends to derail my creativity and adds pressure where it’s not needed. My aim is to foster a safe, LGBTQ-friendly space where community and creativity flow without anyone feeling boxed in.

Which brings me to another experiment I’ve been running lately: Finding the “right” AI voice for my videos. For those who don’t know, I’ve never been particularly fond of hearing my own voice. I’ve tested dozens of text-to-speech generators, and some premium voices really stood out—but I ultimately settled on using the “Good Guy” voice in CapCut.

I thought “Good Guy” was good enough…until I heard “Derek.”

If you’re listening to this newsletter’s recording, you hopefully agree “Derek” sounds pretty damn realistic. Definitely better than most AI voices I’ve heard. “Derek” also, to me, sounds like “me”…in my imagination at least.

While I’m still find myself torn between authenticity and automation, the AI voice gives me the ability to focus on the visual and creative aspects of my work. And, frankly, if I have to use my real voice…all my videos will be silent.

Deciding whether to use an AI voice (or not) is similar to the balancing act I face with paywalls—finding that sweet spot between offering something of value without creating barriers.

AI voices save time, but can lack the emotional nuance of human connection.
Paywalls support my work financially, but risk alienating those who can’t pay.

For now, I’m open to feedback. Whether it’s about AI voices, paywalls, or anything else, I’m here to experiment, learn, and grow. This process is about figuring out what works, and that only happens through community and discussion.

So, if you’ve got thoughts, I’m listening.

If you’re curious about AI voices, I’ll share more of my journey with that too.

And if you want to support the creative work I’m putting out there—whether financially or through engagement—I appreciate you either way. We’re in this together.

Thanks for reading…and subscribing!
Clint


FOUND PHOTOS OF THE DAY

undefined
CHARLES BLONDIN CROSSING THE NIAGARA RIVER

ON THIS DAY = SEPTEMBER 26

BIRTHDAYS

EVENTS


ON SUBSTACK = NEW


ON YOUTUBE = NEW

MORE FROM COLLIDE PRESS
Ko-Fi + Linktree + Shop + Storefront + YouTube

Discussion about this episode

Most people find their recorded voices strange, the physics of it is that the lower frequencies are amplified by being transmitted by bone to our ear, so what we hear has a greater mix on the bass side (men and women). However, I know I find my recorded voice overpronounced and fussy, like a bad imitation of Vincent Price or something. I can't bear it. So I can easily understand why someone might prefer an AI voice to their own.

Expand full comment

Never thought about the actual physics of hearing ourselves. My issue may have more to do with being called a "sissy" so much as a kid (because I was one lol) and the pronounced Southern drawl that still slips in despite moving away over half my life ago. I think "Derek" will fill in for me nicely. I'm not sure everyone would know it wasn't real if I didn't point it out. Or maybe they would. Hard to say anymore. :-)

Expand full comment

Downtown Abbey (?)

Expand full comment

I would say I did it on purpose, but we know I'm just a typo-ist. :-)

Btw, did you ever see the Jimmy Fallon parody? "Downton Sixbey" is hilarious:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFEabHQWntg

Expand full comment

Thank you for that reference. As famous as Downton Abbey is, I just kinda assumed there must be a parody, and I look forward to watching it.

Your contemplation of privileges for paying viewers and the undesired consequences of imposing paywalls is entirely appropriate. Numbers of views and nice words do not pay the expenses, so sometimes hard decisions must be made. As for me, I think I am getting very much my money's worth and have been looking at upgrading to founding member status quite seriously. There you have the nice words; now I should actually make the money move. Best wishes.

Expand full comment

You're a sweetheart, Sam! If you enjoy the parody, there is a Part II that slays as well. I don't know if they made any more. No pressure on the upgrade...I had removed it but a generous patron asked me to add it back. So who am I to refuse the kindness? Cheers to you and yours.

Expand full comment

Derek sounds AWESOME!! Good choice!

Expand full comment

Thanks, Bobby! I think he and I are gonna become good friends. Though I do need to train him how to pronounce Collide correctly. CO-LIDE ain't a-working for me. :-)

Expand full comment