I am so sorry you have to deal with this crap on YouTube, Clint! This morning, I saw a YT video about Body Art posted over a year ago. There was full-frontal nudity of both male and female adults, and it ran for at least five minutes. Although I must admit I find this kind of content titillating, it boggles my mind that this material see…
I am so sorry you have to deal with this crap on YouTube, Clint! This morning, I saw a YT video about Body Art posted over a year ago. There was full-frontal nudity of both male and female adults, and it ran for at least five minutes. Although I must admit I find this kind of content titillating, it boggles my mind that this material seems acceptable by YT "standards." Why are art forms like your vintage montages considered offensive, but content with live-action exhibitionism is okay? Excuse my French, but how can vintage, black, and white still image cocks be offensive but barely concealed, or painted cocks are acceptable? Of course, I'm sure it's complicated and I don't expect you to respond to my questions. I just wanted you to know that as a paid subscriber to your Substack, I hope you will someday have enough contributors to drop YouTube once and for all! I love your work, especially your NSFW content on Substack. I find your montages beautiful and comforting. They made me realize that our culture has existed since photography was invented (and before)! Please continue with your inspiring content!
Thanks for the kind words, Mike. YouTube seems to have an issue with considering what I do artistic or creative, so they feel justified in censoring the fuck out it. I feel justified calling them out at every turn and doing my best to point out their hypocrisy and ignorance. If you ever want to be amused—and frustrated—Google their “Community Guidelines” sometime and be prepared to role your eyes. It’s more restrictive than most primetime tv networks. And can be interpreted to be even more restrictive without much effort. Corporate cowards in my book. Substack’s guidelines make actual sense, which isn’t so common in these hear internets. Cheers and appreciate you and your support!
I am so sorry you have to deal with this crap on YouTube, Clint! This morning, I saw a YT video about Body Art posted over a year ago. There was full-frontal nudity of both male and female adults, and it ran for at least five minutes. Although I must admit I find this kind of content titillating, it boggles my mind that this material seems acceptable by YT "standards." Why are art forms like your vintage montages considered offensive, but content with live-action exhibitionism is okay? Excuse my French, but how can vintage, black, and white still image cocks be offensive but barely concealed, or painted cocks are acceptable? Of course, I'm sure it's complicated and I don't expect you to respond to my questions. I just wanted you to know that as a paid subscriber to your Substack, I hope you will someday have enough contributors to drop YouTube once and for all! I love your work, especially your NSFW content on Substack. I find your montages beautiful and comforting. They made me realize that our culture has existed since photography was invented (and before)! Please continue with your inspiring content!
Thanks for the kind words, Mike. YouTube seems to have an issue with considering what I do artistic or creative, so they feel justified in censoring the fuck out it. I feel justified calling them out at every turn and doing my best to point out their hypocrisy and ignorance. If you ever want to be amused—and frustrated—Google their “Community Guidelines” sometime and be prepared to role your eyes. It’s more restrictive than most primetime tv networks. And can be interpreted to be even more restrictive without much effort. Corporate cowards in my book. Substack’s guidelines make actual sense, which isn’t so common in these hear internets. Cheers and appreciate you and your support!