Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David P Bangtson's avatar

Just had to throw in a comment about the erotic vs explicit content. I now know that it probably doesn't matter much as far as keeping the photo police out of your hair, but I have given this a lot of thought since the subject came up. To me, there are really three groupings. 1. Erotic, i.e. suggestive of sexual arousal, but without any frontal nudity at all. 2. Enticing, which is where I would prefer to have the line drawn. This group would include photos of genitals in flaccid, partially aroused, and erect state, but without any sexual activity being included, either still photos or video excerpts. 3. The truly pornographic, which we all can get for free almost anywhere, where the photos and videos clearly show participants involved in sexual activity of some sort. I don't believe in censorship of any kind, but I didn't and wouldn't subscribe to your site if what I wanted to see was pornography. But the second group provides us with a whole class of photos and videos which are almost impossible to find in any other way and yet serve an important role when evaluating and demonstrating the whole range of nudity. To be clear, I am not asking you to risk your income on the arbitrary views of a few self-centered credit card execs, but I am hoping that you will agree that this "third" category of nudity is real and very hard to find.

Expand full comment
allen's avatar

It is so reassuring to encounter the occasional kind human being. I am grateful Clint, thank you for being in the world at the same time I am.

Expand full comment
13 more comments...