
While battling YouTubeās army of bots, bureaucrats, and bullies over the companyās selective enforcement (and reading) of its Nudity & Sexual Content policy, Iāve had a lot of time to think about why I care so much, why I fight so much.
Iām not a nudist nor a pornographer. But I find nothing wrong with either.
Not to get too political, but as a moderate liberal, I am decidedly laissez-faire about all areas of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. If grown people wanna do grown people stuff (that isnāt hurting anyoneā¦or is only hurting someone whoās consented to being hurt), itās nobodyās business but theirs. And if they share that business and it bothers youā¦look for something that doesnāt.
Iām so tired of so many folks feeling their opinions are more important than everyone elseās right to do with their bodies and lives whatever they want/need. Itās exhausting and unnecessary.
Do you, boo. Iāll do me.
Seeing a global company make up subjective rules that use āsexual gratificationā as a measuring stick (without bothering to define plainly what that is) is offensive to me. As an artist, man, and human being.
In its Content Guidelines, Substack has common sense rules about ānudity, porn, and erotica.ā Why canāt Google? Likely because they like controlling everything and enjoy moving goalposts after the games have begun.
ON NUDITY
Whatever you (or YouTube) feel about nudity, weāre all born naked. And most of us are naked at some point at least once a day for the rest of our lives. (Hopefully. Air. It. Out.)
Nudity has and will always exist. Itās literally how we come into this world.
Debating nudity is proof some folks are just dumb. Or trying to distract from other shit.
Nudity lets it all hang out. And fall where it may. What will be will be. Praise be.
Whatever you (or YouTube) feel about dragāor RuPaulā¦our relationship is of the āitās complicatedā varietyāthis sums up my feelings on everything from birthday suits to three-piece suits:
āWe're all born naked and the rest is drag."
RuPaul Charles
ON SEX + SEXUALITY
Whatever you (or YouTube) feel about sex and sexuality, they are part of what makes us human.
In case you missed that day of sex education: Sex is how babies are made.
Gross and shocking, I know, but also very true. Soā¦clutch those pearls, gurrrls.
But sex is more than just for procreationā¦for most, itās for recreation too.
Some do it for fun.
Some do it for a living.
Some do it with or without pay.
Some only do it with the opposite gender.
Some only with the same gender.
Some do it with all/most genders.
Donāt like it? Do you, boo. Iāll do me.
ON SEXUAL CONTENT
Whatever you (or YouTube) feel about sexual content, please know that every piece of ācontentā ever made, in the course of human history, is āsexualā content to someone.
What turns people on is as unique and varied as fingerprints and snowflakes.
Trying to guess what will/wonāt turn on someone is childish and a waste of time.
In the course of human history, trying to control or restrict āsexual contentā tends to make it more taboo (and valuable). Where thereās a will, man will find a way.
And if Googleās āSafeSearchā wonāt show it, other search engines will.
āSexually progressive cultures gave us literature, philosophy, civilization, and the rest, while sexually restrictive cultures gave us the Dark Ages and the Holocaust.ā
Alan Moore
25,000 Years of Erotic Freedom
Donāt like porn? Donāt watch porn. Simple, right?
As for those that point out itās often exploitive to women and minors, I think itās safe to say capitalism and social media are at least, if not more, exploitive to us all, regardless of age, gender, race, or sexual orientation.
Not to mention all the other problems so many wanna blitch and glitch about online but donāt do anything about in real life.
I wish these outrage āperformance artistsā would find a new way to express their creativity. Marina AbramoviÄ is my kind of performance artist: Most of her work is done in complete silence. And occasionally has been done nude.
As for pedophiles and those making sexual content for them, my rule has always been and will always be:
CONSENTING ADULTS ONLY.
NO KIDS. NO ANIMALS. NO EXCEPTIONS.
Break those rules?
Go to hell and jail.
Simple, right?
ON ARTISTIC NUDITY (SEX OPTIONAL)
Whatever you (or YouTube) feel about art or artistic nudity, itās been around as long as we have. Mankind has been painting ourselves and our āprivate partsā forever.
Countless pre-historic examples exist in around the world. Caves, museums, and pyramids are filled with all kinds of nudity and examples of the human form.
And many also depict sexual acts. Cuzā¦most humans like sex. Whether itās having sex or seeing sex be had. If weāre lucky (and honest), almost all adults have had sex at least once. (And some of us have had it once, twice, three times a ladyā¦but whoās counting or keeping score?)
This might come as a surprise to some, but as a creative gay man, I find few things as beautiful as nude (or nearly nude) men. Always have. Always will. Shocking, right?
Always beautiful. But not always sexual or sexually gratifying.
Most adults I know seem to understand that difference.
Bots, bureaucrats, and bullies seem unable or unwilling to understand the distinction.
ADULTS ONLY
These photos are part of a small collection of vintage photos I find beautiful. So beautiful theyāre available in my Shop. But before I added them, to be safe, I double-checked with my shopās platform/production partner. Just to make sure they were okay with artistic nudity.
Lucky for me (and you, if youāre interested), they were. Because so many arenāt.
Itās so lovely when grown people donāt treat other grown people like children.
In my book, art and beauty require love in respect.
I do understand the need for SOME censoriship and discretion. Not everybody wants to see genitalia. Thatās why I mark posts I think some might not appreciate ā(NSFW).ā But anything more than SOME gets on my my last good nerve.
Anyone pretending men donāt have bulges and butts, for instance, makes me question their ability to see and think clearly.
HOW DO I REALLY FEEL?
In case I havenāt made it abundantly clear alredy, YouTubeās bots, bureaucrats, and bullies piss me off. (But Iām not sure YouTube gets that we will never be friends, even though Iāve spelled it out repeatedly. Bots and bot-like humans are dumb and are not my cup of tea.)
You'Tubeās Nudity & Sexual Content policy is written as vaguely as possible, but seems intended to be enforced as specifically as possible to reinforce āthe male gazeā and prevent āthe male gayze.ā
Long story short, hereās how I sum up my define their double standard:
Boobs with barely-covered nipples are fine and dandy.
Women are eye candy.Bulges bigger than Kenās better be in cargo shorts.
Men are handy, not eye candy.
Last night, mad from yet another email from YouTube Creator (Un)Support, I decided to make myself a T-Shirt. I ended up liking it so much itās now available for anyone else similarly mad as hell and not going to take it anymore.
While I do wish YouTube made me less bitchy and glitchy (as Iām sure many others do tooā¦maybe you, boo), I plan to wear the T-Shirt with pride. Pants optional. š¤£š
ON HAPPY ENDINGS
While writing this post, I received an email from Substack letting me know Collide Press now officially has 100 subscribers. I canāt express how happy (and relieved) I am to be publish my work on a platform that respects creators.
I also canāt express how grateful I am to those of you whoāve chosen to subscribe and support my work here on Substack. So I wonāt tryā¦itās time to finish getting dressed and get this work weekās party started.
Thanks for reading!
Clint
Male nudity and homoerotic artforms are natural manifestations of who we are. Pride!
I Say this in Instagram to you,but i say again,Before I watched gay porn and male nudity to have fun and orgasm, but when I met Tom of Finland and his life story, I realized that gay porn and male nudity is a political act against the misogynistic and exploitative system we live in.