AI "Vintage" Fauxtos
Newsletter
Whether you like, loathe, or love AI, itās a modern-day fact of life. Itās everywhere.
As I do my daily art and photo research, Iāve been noticing more and more āphotosā that lookā¦too good to be true. Or not good enough to be true depending on your POV.
For my vintage photos montages, I do my best to make sure the photos are as ārealā as possible. (But given the endless possibilities of digital imaging now, Iām not sure whatās considered ārealā anymore. Definitions and opinions vary greatly.)
Long before digital retouching or AI-generators existed, artists and photographers have been used whatever technology, tools, and tricks available to āmake it work.ā
Dodging and burning has been around as long as photography itself. So have other, more creative techniques.
Long story short, art and photos donāt always tell the unvarnished truth. Which isnāt necessarily a bad thing. They help us see each other in our best light. Right?
Given the increasing popularity of AI-generated āphotosā (aka āfauxtosā) I decided to experiment and make a montage of āvintageā fauxtos made with the help of a free AI generator.
Let me know what your thoughts. Iām curious.
Please keep it kindā¦or rewind (elsewhere).
Thanks for watching!
Clint
P.S. This is likely a one-time, proof-of-concept montage. I have almost 200 years of actual photo history to choose from without adding any more of āvintageā fauxtos to the motley mix. šøš
PAID SUBSCRIBERS SAYā¦
Today, to celebrate 400+ subscribers here on Substack, Iām sharing 5 short-but-sweet notes some of the paid subscribers shared when they signed up.
NOTE: If youāve never used Substack, it has lot more bells and whistles than the average bear (me) could ever (put to good) use. Over the weekend, I (re)discovered the section where paid subscribers leave messages when the sign up. So sweet!
If youāre able to support my work, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. ā¤ļøā¤ļø
SOCIAL MEDIA BREAK
After over a year of posting on Threads, I decided to stop the other day.
Zuck and Team Meta-Static just canāt help but try to control everything on their platforms. Every. Zucking. Thing. And I finally had enough. Again.
I stopped posting on Facebook and Instagram in my personal life years ago for the same reason. Now, in my professional life, Iāve stopped FB, IG, AND Threads.
Iād rather make content for people who want to see my work. In this attention-based economy, I just canāt be bothered with platforms that openly disrespect their users.
So Iāve decided, for now, to step away from those platforms and focus on ones that connect me to community and inspire me to create. Like Substack. šāļø
RIP, SUSAN WOJCICKI
On Friday, news that Susan Wojcicki, YouTubeās former CEO, had died at 56 (after a two-year battle with cancer) made headlines.
While I didnāt know her, she was amongst a small group of people who, while mostly out of the public eye, managed to change the course of human historyā¦A LOT.
During her almost 25 years at Google and YouTube, Ms. Wojcicki helped turn the scrappy startup (Googleās first office was literally in her garage) into the global behemoth (now collectively known as Alphabet Inc.) most of us use, if not always like.
Like many content creators, my heart goes out to her family, still reeling from the loss of her 19-year-old son in February.
Like many content creators, I also have mixed feelings about Wojcickiās legacy.
On the one hand, she was instrumental in making both Google AdSense and the YouTube Partner Program happen, enabling countless creators (myself included) a chance to monetize our work on the platform.
On the other hand, Wojcicki helped decide that Google/YouTube should get 45% of the AdSense revenue for that privilege. (It doesnāt have to be fair or make senseā¦itās literally called Google AdSense after all.)
I struggle with many of the decisions Ms. Wojcicki made while leading YouTube.
Even as I realize most of those decisions helped make YouTube as successful as it is, the power the platform wields to censor art, culture, and even news continues to go unchecked.
āPower tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely.ā
Lord Acton
Protected by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, YouTube uses the āGood Samaritanā provision to ban, censor, and more it doesnāt agree with, like, or deem āadvertiser-friendly.ā
While free speech only applies to the government (here in the US), given YouTubeās global reach, I think itās quickly becoming a public utility, becoming the main replacement for those whoāve stopped watching broadcast and cable television.
Not that more regulation would fix the problem, but Iām not sure Google/YouTube is interested in solving any of its many problemsā¦just making more AdSense with the help of more ads, bots, and bot-like bureaucrats. More bandages, but more cuts too.
Iāve watched enough interviews, I feel like Iād have liked Susan Wojcicki in real life.
And know I would have still disagreed with her too.
RIP, Susan. šÆš¢
āVINTAGEā FAUXTOS
MUSIC
Golden Age Radio / How We Met
Golden Age Radio / Tea for Two
Golden Age Radio / No Summer Without You
Golden Age Radio / Sneaking Unnoticed
Courtesy Of Epidemic Sound
MORE FROM COLLIDE PRESS
Bluesky + Ko-Fi + Linktree + Shop
+ Storefront + Threadless + YouTube
